ยินดีต้อนรับคุณ, บุคคลทั่วไป
หน้าหลัก | เข้าสู่ระบบ หรือ ลงทะเบียน
Username: Password:
  วันเสาร์ที่ 23 พฤศจิกายน พ.ศ.2567
  คำค้นหา:
รีวิวเกมจากแฟน GM
รีวิวเกม
สาระน่าเรื่องเกม
บทความเกม
Gamemag online รายสิบวัน
Magazine
Screen Shot
Game Update
คลิปเกมจากยูทูป
Game Tube
Emu และ Rom เกม
Emu&rom
Cosplay
Cosplay
Wallpaper
WallPaper
ภาพวาดจากแฟน GM
Art Corner
Gamemag on Facebook
Facebook
                   
สมาชิกทุกท่านโปรดอ่านก่อน*กฎกติกาของบอร์ด*
รวมวิธีโพสภาพ,คลิป,การใส่ลายเซ็น และอื่นๆ
...
Animategroup.com - GAMEMAG - A guide for specifying drainage geocomposites
ผู้ตั้งกระทู้ ข้อความ
upamfva / Member
ID : M07665

Level : เกมกดซึเนโอะ
Exp. : 23%
จิตพิสัย : -71%
Like : 0
Post : 619
Reply : 13
Sex : ชาย
วันที่สมัคร : 2021-06-11
PM Profile
Topic : A guide for specifying drainage geocomposites
«date: 21 สิงหาคม 2564 , 17:16:21 »
 แก้ไข  

A guide for specifying drainage geocomposites


In September 2017, ASTM International released its Standard Guide for Specifying Drainage Geocomposites (ASTM D7931). The standard provides a guideline for calculating engineering properties related to drainage geocomposites, specifically allowable flow rate, associated reduction factors and shear strength properties. In basic terms, it codified design procedures so that the engineering community would have a uniform design approach. ASTM D7931 addresses a variety of drainage geocomposites, including biaxial and triaxial geonet geocomposites, and multilinear drainage geocomposites.Get more news about Geosynthetic Geocomposite,you can vist our website!

Drainage geocomposites are used to meet the regulatory requirements for liquid or gas removal in a variety of applications including foundations, mechanically stabilized walls, landfills and other subsurface drainage system applications. Commonly used drainage geocomposites are comprised of a high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geonet sandwiched between two needlepunched nonwoven geotextiles; however, innovative products like multilinear drainage geocomposites use perforated mini-pipes in place of the geonet.

The heart of ASTM D7931 is to provide a standard equation that can be used to design and specify a drainage geocomposite for most applications (Equation 1). The equation should be familiar to many in the industry and is included in the Geosynthetic Institute’s GRI Standard GC8, Standard Guide for Determination of the Allowable Flow Rate of a Drainage Geocomposite.

The performance of drainage geocomposites is limited by several factors that should be considered when specifying/designing (1) geotextile intrusion into the geonet, RFGI; (2) geonet crushing, RFCR (i.e., creep); and (3) biological and chemical impacts, RFCC and RFBC.

A summary of typical ranges for each of the reduction factors for some common applications of drainage geocomposites is provided in Table 1 along with the reduction factors that can be used for multilinear drainage geocomposites. Unlike what happens with geonet drainage geocomposites, normal load has little effect on the transmissivity of multilinear drainage geocomposites. Transmissivity is not affected because the stresses on the mini-pipes are reduced due to soil arching and load transfer (Figures 1a and 1b), and there is no geotextile intrusion or creep over time.

Laboratory test data on a multilinear drainage geocomposite demonstrates that the transmissivity of the product is neither load nor time sensitive. When the product is properly confined, increasing the normal load does not significantly affect the transmissivity at loadings up to 50,000 pounds per square foot (244,000 kg/m2). Additionally, test data indicates no change in transmissivity over the first 1,000 hours (Blond, Fourmont and Saunier 2013).

Multiple studies were performed on the long-term transmissivity of biological clogging of a multilinear drainage geocomposite. Over an 18-month test program, neither the geotextile filter nor the mini-pipe of a multilinear drainage geocomposite treated with non-leachable, silver-based biocide treatment appeared to clog, and it exhibited the same or better long-term hydraulic behavior than the gravel layer (Fourmont and Koerner 2017).

Additionally, over a three-year test program that simulated in-landfill conditions, the residual long-term flow capacity of a multilinear drainage geocomposite (designated as NWNP w TUBE in Figure 2) was about 75%, whereas a typical single-sided geonet geocomposite (designated as NWNP w GN in Figure 2) was about 30% (Saunier, Steinhauser and Fourmont 2017 and GRI Standard 2013).


   ip: 104.233.231.177 
...

ผู้ใช้งานขณะนี้มีผู้ออนไลน์ 176 คน บอรด์มีทั้งหมด : 8,401 กระทู้ รวม  : 30,997 คำตอบ เข้าอ่านกระทู้ทั้งหมด : 15,092,339 ครั้ง
ดูตอบกระทู้ล่าสุดบนบอร์ด

0ขาจร, 176สาวก
ผู้ใช้เมื่อ 5 นาทีที่ผ่านมา:
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

HBD : no member

 

Copyright 2007 Animate Group Co.,Ltd. All rights reserved.